SoC AssessPoints (5): Left Area - Old Inertia
YWS
(3rd Edition 2018-2019)
This document is a sequel to "SoC AssessPoints (4): Right Area - Thought Expansion".
Below are the AssessPoints of the "Area 5".
----------Table of Contents----------
*Part 1: Mental Inertia
1. Thought Inertia
1.1 Influence of Traditional Concepts
1.2 Influence of Social Opinion
1.3 Influence of School Education
1.4 Influence of Family Environment
1.5 Influence of Changes in New Life Stages
1.6 Influence of Sudden Turning Events
2. Behavioral Response Inertia
2.1 Regular Event Response Patterns
2.2 Unexpected Event Response Patterns
2.3 Innovative Response Patterns
2.4 Despair Response Patterns
3. Emotional Response Inertia
3.1 Anger Patterns
3.2 Guilt and Self-blame Patterns
3.3 Jealousy Patterns
3.4 Shame Patterns
3.5 Fear and Scared Patterns
3.6 Anxiety and Worry Patterns
3.7 Inferiority and Pessimism Patterns
3.8 Arrogance and Conceit Patterns
*Part 2: Subconscious Inertia
1. Fluidity
1.1 Thought Inertia Fluidity
1.2 Emotional Inertia Fluidity
1.3 Inertia Threshold Fluidity
1.4 Core Inertia Fluidity
1.5 Single Inertia Fluidity
1.6 Combined Inertia Fluidity
1.7 Superficial Inertia Fluidity
1.8 Intermediate Inertia Fluidity
1.9 Deep Inertia Fluidity
2. Extensibility
2.1 Stability of Extensibility
2.2 Range of Extensibility
2.3 Flexibility of Extensibility
2.4 Depth of Extensibility
2.5 Refinement of Extensibility
2.6 Variability of Extensibility
3. Differentiation
3.1 Stability of Differentiation
3.2 Fineness of Differentiation
3.3 Weakening of Differentiation
3.4 Combination of Differentiation
3.5 Fluidity of Differentiation
3.6 Softness of Differentiation
4. Primary Retention Level
4.1 Quantity of Primary Retention
4.2 Form of Primary Retention
4.3 Quality of Primary Retention
4.4 Cyclic Primary Retention
5. Secondary Development Level
5.1 Quantity of Secondary Development
5.2 Form of Secondary Development
5.3 Quality of Secondary Development
5.4 Cyclic Secondary Development
6. Influence of Inducement
6.1 Influence of Mental Programs
6.2 Influence of Hypnotic Waves
6.3 Influence of Hypnotic Implants
6.4 Influence of Other Functional Implants
6.5 Depth of Influence
6.6 Breadth of Influence
6.7 Intensity of Influence
6.8 Variability of Influence
6.9 Integration of Inducement Methods
----------
Old Inertia Area is divided into two major parts:
1. Mental Inertia
2. Subconscious Inertia
Part 1: Mental Inertia
Mental processes formed by life programming and environmental influences, which create consciousness inertia in oneself. It is divided into three sub-parts:
1. Thought Inertia
2. Behavioral Response Inertia
3. Emotional Response Inertia
1. Thought Inertia
The tendencies and inertia in an individual's thinking process.
Human thinking patterns are related to concepts and always follow certain perspectives and beliefs.
*Quantitative Data:
The influence of mental models on human thought inertia is generally around 60%.
There are 6 sub-points:
1.1 Influence of Traditional Concepts
Traditional concepts passed down through history by nations, ethnic groups, and regions create broad and deep thought inertia and subjective standards for individuals.
*Quantitative Data:
Humans generally fall between 60-80%.
1.2 Influence of Social Opinion
The current social situation and public opinion create new concepts and standards adapted to the current society, which are absorbed or incorporated into the existing thought system, becoming new consciousness inertia.
However, this is essentially the same as traditional concepts, just with updated standards that continue to restrict humanity.
This is part of the T-Group's (*) hypnosis strategy: when previous standards are no longer tolerable, they are updated to a new, upgraded version, advertised as more scientific, reasonable, and humane, representing social progress.
The T-Group updates these "new standards" according to the trends of human awakening.
A new set of standards will soon be introduced, which is already being disseminated. These new standards sound very inspiring, almost like a milestone in human development. However, the upgrade is not fully formed and is still being gradually improved.
*Quantitative Data:
The average human influence is about 60%.
Method to break free: Be aware of what spiritual things you use to measure, judge, and manipulate others.
*For more on the T-Group, refer to another article by YWS, "What is Hypnotic Reincarnation?"
1.3 Influence of School Education
Schools promote or advocate certain idealized concepts and behavior norms, encouraging students to follow and implement them.
Most of the teachings in school fade in society, with only about 20-40% of the core content being truly digested and incorporated into the students' thought systems.
For educational brainwashing, this proportion is already sufficient.
*Quantitative Data:
Humans generally fall between 20-40%, with differences by country. Developed countries are around 40%.
Developed countries emphasize quality education, instilling many standards and ideas in students.
1.4 Influence of Family Environment
The growing environment in the family, including the personality and views of parents or caregivers, has a certain degree of influence on the individual.
*Quantitative Data:
Humans generally fall between 40-60%.
1.5 Influence of Changes in New Life Stages
In the growth process, individuals encounter new life stages, such as work, marriage, childbearing, and aging, which lead to changes in mentality and the automatic collection of new standards and procedures to arm oneself.
Most of these standards are not updates but additional ones, adding some burden and pressure to the individual's mentality.
*Quantitative Data:
The average human influence is about 60%.
1.6 Influence of Sudden Turning Events
Unexpected setbacks in the growth process cause significant life turning events, impacting the individual's mentality and influencing the previous thinking patterns and concepts.
After the turn, the individual abandons some old concepts to seek new ones suitable for their situation.
*Quantitative Data:
The average human influence is about 40%.
2. Behavioral Response Inertia
The habitual behavioral response influenced by mental processes when an individual encounters events.
This is the individual's belief about how they should face events, generally rational and seemingly correct from their perspective.
*Quantitative Data:
Humans generally fall between 60-80%.
There are 4 sub-points:
2.1 Regular Event Response Patterns
Typical regular events that individuals are generally prepared for and have response methods.
*Quantitative Data:
Humans generally fall between 60-80%.
2.2 Unexpected Event Response Patterns
When encountering irregular or unexpected events, the individual must rethink how to respond.
*Quantitative Data:
The average human influence is about 60%.
2.3 Innovative Response Patterns
When the original concepts remain unchanged, the individual changes their response method for self-interest.
After forming a new response method, the individual feels they have changed and become more mature.
This pattern is misleading; it’s essentially the same, just a new appearance.
This is also part of the T-Group's hypnosis strategy: diverting human attention to achieving their goals through different "behavioral patterns."
Many brainwashing articles teach people to use various techniques to maintain their existing concepts and achieve corresponding goals.
This hypnosis strategy covers multiple angles, attacking from various angles.
*Quantitative Data:
The average human influence is about 40%.
2.4 Despair Response Patterns
When individuals encounter certain events where they cannot take any proactive measures to change the situation, they can only passively accept it, reacting in a state of despair.
This response is related to mental patterns, based on the individual’s belief system about what to do in such circumstances.
For example, someone diagnosed with a terminal illness might think they should enjoy life, continue treatment, or seek revenge against society, depending on their beliefs.
Other situations may include separation, bankruptcy, lawsuits, or environmental influences.
The more significant the event, the less the mental patterns influence the individual.
In less severe cases, individuals are more likely to adopt a mental processing approach.
*Quantitative Data:
Humans generally fall between 30-60%.
3. Emotional Response Inertia
This refers to the legitimate emotions an individual believes they should have in response to certain events.
For example:
If someone speaks ill of you, you believe you should be angry.
If someone is leaving, you feel you should be reluctant to let them go.
If you see others suffering, you believe you should feel sad, and so on.
Sometimes, emotions are controlled by the mind, leading to the emotions that one thinks they should have.
The primary mechanism is the mind’s identification and judgment of the nature of events, which then triggers corresponding emotional patterns.
For instance:
If an event is perceived as an offense against oneself, anger will be triggered.
Many human emotions are driven by this kind of false recognition by the mind.
This also falls under one of the hypnosis strategies.
Some of these strategies stir up conflicts between individuals.
For example:
Numerous articles constantly teach you what the real meaning of someone’s behavior is, what it implies, and what it expresses. They may suggest that certain behaviors, which you might not have been aware of, actually signify that you were offended or that boundaries were crossed.
After reading these, individuals may feel enlightened. However, without these suggestions, they might not have noticed anything at all.
Nowadays, even a facial expression or a word is interpreted as a sign that the other person doesn’t care about you, and so on.
This is an effective hypnosis strategy, a method of indoctrination that is continuously updated and upgraded with changing times.
(There is a lot to explore in this area. Those interested can make it a dedicated research topic.)
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 60-80%.
There are 8 sub-points:
3.1 Anger Patterns
- The most common pattern. Most of the anger experienced by humans is triggered by mental processes.
*Quantitative Data:
The average for humans is around 80%.
3.2 Guilt/Self-Blame Patterns
- Traditional concepts and social standards have led people to believe that they should feel guilt and self-blame for certain events, thinking it’s all their fault.
- When an event occurs and the individual fails to handle it properly, it triggers feelings of guilt and self-blame.
*Quantitative Data:
The average for humans is around 60%.
3.3 Jealousy Patterns
- Due to comparisons, when individuals cannot reach the social average standard, they develop hostility towards those who meet or exceed that standard.
- This emotion is complex in composition but is easily triggered. It is one of the commonly used methods of emotional manipulation.
- This emotion is easy to fall into and hard to escape from.
- It can persist long-term within an individual, continuously affecting them.
- It’s like a time bomb, a good fuse for triggering a chain of negative emotions.
*Quantitative Data:
The average for humans is around 60%.
3.4 Shame Patterns
- In certain situations, when one feels they behaved inappropriately, it leads to feelings of embarrassment and awkwardness that are hard to forget and feel shameful.
- This emotion reduces self-confidence and can cause issues in interpersonal relationships.
*Quantitative Data:
The average for humans is around 60%.
3.5 Fear/Scared Patterns
- Influenced by certain concepts, people believe that certain scenarios should be frightening, so they preemptively develop a sense of fear.
- Examples include fear of the dark, fear of ghosts, fear of people borrowing money, etc.
*Quantitative Data:
Commonly, humans fall between 40-60%.
3.6 Anxiety/Worry Patterns
- Influenced by the social environment, concepts of artificially created insecurity make people feel anxious and worried about their future.
*Quantitative Data:
The average for humans is around 80%.
3.7 Inferiority/Pessimism Patterns
- A more negative outlook on people and things, often associated with inferiority, leading to a lower self-evaluation.
- Essentially, everyone has some feelings of inferiority because no one is perfect, making this an area where the mind can easily exert control.
- Control Mode:
Through constant comparisons, individual "weaknesses" are reinforced, leading to a lack of self-confidence and the belief that one is inadequate, thereby undermining the individual.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 60-80%.
- Inferiority significantly affects humans. Even those who appear cheerful and confident often harbor feelings of inferiority deep inside, which they avoid showing and try to escape from themselves.
- If the value reaches around 80%, it can significantly impact the individual’s overall mindset and hinder their life.
3.8 Arrogance/Conceit Patterns
- This is paired with inferiority, mutually influencing the individual.
- When feeling inferior, individuals often resort to arrogance as a way to adjust their mindset.
- These are two extremes, making it difficult for individuals to achieve true balance.
*Quantitative Data:
The average for humans is around 80%.
- Slightly higher than the value for inferiority. Because people are eager to escape from inferiority, they continuously create various comparisons that favor themselves, elevating themselves while looking down on others.
Part 2: Subconscious Inertia
This section is divided into 6 subsections:
1. Fluidity
2. Extensibility
3. Differentiation
4. Primary Retention Level
5. Secondary Development Level
6. Influence of Inducement
1. Fluidity
Subconscious inertia fluidity refers to how easily the subconscious patterns can shift.
If the fluidity is slow, it means that the inertia is more solidified. High fluidity indicates greater flexibility.
If the fluidity is at 100%, it means there are no barriers, and the patterns can be switched at will seamlessly, free from inertia.
*Quantitative Data:
For humans, the general range is 20-60%.
There are 9 sub-points:
1.1 Thought Inertia Fluidity
This refers to how quickly an individual can switch from one thought pattern to another. Fast switching indicates flexible thinking. Slow switching indicates stubbornness and inflexibility in thinking.
*Quantitative Data:
The average for humans is around 40%.
1.2 Emotional Inertia Fluidity
High values indicate strong emotional regulation and adaptability to various stressful environments.
Low values indicate difficulty in resolving negative emotions, making them more likely to have a long-term impact.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 30-60%.
1.3 Inertia Threshold Fluidity
Individuals with flexible inertia thresholds are more adaptable and capable of adjusting to different situations.
In contrast, rigid thresholds indicate a strong adherence to principles, making it difficult to adjust to changing circumstances.
*Quantitative Data:
The average for humans is around 60%.
1.4 Core Inertia Fluidity
This refers to the degree of change in an individual’s core inertias.
High fluidity indicates openness to different viewpoints and ideas.
Low fluidity indicates a conservative nature that struggles to accept new concepts.
*Quantitative Data:
The average for humans is around 60%.
1.5 Single Inertia Fluidity
This refers to the fluidity of ideas and emotions related to a single inertia.
High fluidity indicates that this inertia is elastic and adaptable.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 40-60%.
1.6 Combined Inertia Fluidity
This refers to how individuals automatically combine different inertias to adapt to various situations. The flexibility and variability of these combinations are factors contributing to the complexity and diversity of human personalities.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 60-80%.
1.7 Superficial Inertia Fluidity
This refers to the fluidity of superficial subconscious inertias that directly affect the individual and have a noticeable impact on personality expression, unrelated to the depth of the human body-complex.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 30-60%.
1.8 Intermediate Inertia Fluidity
This refers to the part of subconscious inertia that indirectly influences the individual, serving as a source for superficial subconscious inertia. It’s a deeper source of personality traits.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 20-50%.
1.9 Deep Inertia Fluidity
This refers to the deepest, most unnoticeable parts of subconscious inertia, which are the root causes. These deeply ingrained inertias significantly influence individuals and serve as sources for both superficial and intermediate subconscious inertia.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 10-20%.
2. Extensibility
Extensibility refers to how far a single subconscious inertia can expand.
The stronger the extensibility, the more pronounced the impact of that inertia on the individual.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 40-60%.
There are 6 sub-points:
2.1 Stability of Extensibility
This refers to the degree to which the strength and tendency of inertia remain unchanged during its expansion.
Many inertias undergo some changes during expansion. A high value indicates that the person is highly rigid and inflexible.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 20-50%.
2.2 Range of Extensibility
This refers to how far the inertia can expand and cover.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 60-80%.
2.3 Flexibility of Extensibility
This refers to the degree to which the inertia manifests in different aspects.
The extent of flexibility varies depending on the range of extension.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 30-60%.
2.4 Depth of Extensibility
Different inertias have different levels of influence, varying in proportion across shallow, medium, and deep layers.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 60-80%.
2.5 Refinement of Extensibility
This refers to the degree to which inertia impacts an individual in finer detail, influencing tendencies at many specific levels.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 30-80%.
2.6 Variability of Extensibility
This refers to the degree of variation in the expansion range of different inertias.
Humans share broad commonality in some inertias, while in others, they display individual differences.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 60-80%.
3. Differentiation
Differentiation refers to how a single subconscious inertia continuously subdivides into different smaller inertias, influencing the individual in various aspects.
*Quantitative Data:
The average for humans is around 80%.
There are 6 sub-points:
3.1 Stability of Differentiation
This refers to whether the different smaller inertias that branch out from a major inertia stably inherit certain characteristics of the major inertia, with minimal mutations.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 60-80%.
3.2 Fineness of Differentiation
This refers to how finely the inertia can be subdivided into smaller inertias. Practitioners, at certain stages, have a more refined level of awareness, leading to more intricate differentiation, which influences them in more spiritual aspects. This also explains why many practitioners seem to have more limitations than the average person. The mental system often combines this point to control individuals and strengthen inertia.
(This aspect can be further explored in detailed studies.)
*Quantitative Data:
The average for humans is around 60%.
3.3 Weakening of Differentiation
This refers to the natural weakening or even disappearance of some smaller inertias in different layers of influence. Most of the time, they are replaced by other inertias, though in some cases, they are consciously eliminated by the individual.
*Quantitative Data:
For most humans, 20-30% of smaller inertias will naturally weaken over time.
3.4 Combination of Differentiation
This refers to how smaller inertias, based on the characteristics of the major inertia, combine to form a more complete inertia process. In some ways, it can also be seen as the different ways a major inertia manifests in reality.
*Quantitative Data:
The average for humans is around 80%.
3.5 Fluidity of Differentiation
This refers to the extent to which smaller inertias move away from the major inertia, develop independently, or integrate into other major inertias, or form new major inertias with surrounding smaller inertias.
- **Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 20-60%.
3.6 Softness of Differentiation
This refers to how smoothly and naturally the smaller inertias connect with each other, increasing their concealment and making them harder for the individual to perceive. Individuals with high values may feel that this inertia combination is comfortable. More natural and concealed differentiation is also a major trend in hypnosis.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 40-60%.
4. Primary Retention Level
Primary retention refers to the extent to which an individual’s innate subconscious inertias are preserved.
*Quantitative Data:
For most humans, the range is 60-80%.
There are 4 sub-points:
4.1 Quantity of Primary Retention
This refers to how many of the innate subconscious inertias have been fully preserved without being altered or modified. Some may be redesigned or altered.
*Quantitative Data:
For most humans, 60-80% of these inertias are fully preserved.
4.2 Form of Primary Retention
This refers to the degree to which the form of innate inertias is preserved. Some may be redesigned, while others may be altered by hypnotic influences.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 30-60%.
4.3 Quality of Primary Retention
This refers to the degree of preservation of the finesse and detail of innate inertias. Those with lower retention are cruder and less refined.
*Quantitative Data:
The average for humans is around 60%.
4.4 Cyclic Primary Retention
Some subconscious inertias are reused due to cyclical causes. This value indicates how many of the innate inertias in this life are preserved due to the need for cyclical reasons.
*Quantitative Data:
For most humans, 60-80% of these inertias are preserved due to cyclical causes.
5. Secondary Development Level
Secondary development refers to the degree to which an individual further develops inertia after birth.
*Quantitative Data:
The average for humans is around 60%.
There are 4 sub-points:
5.1 Quantity of Secondary Development
This refers to the proportion of new inertias developed by the individual after birth.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 30-60%.
5.2 Form of Secondary Development
This refers to the proportion of new forms of inertia that have been developed after birth.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 40-60%.
5.3 Quality of Secondary Development
This refers to the degree of refinement in the development of inertia after birth.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 30-60%.
5.4 Cyclic Secondary Development
This refers to the proportion of new cyclic inertias generated during the individual’s development in this life.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 30-40%.
6. Influence of Inducement
This refers to the extent to which the development of an individual's subconscious inertia is influenced by hypnotic waves, devices, and other methods.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 30-60%.
There are 9 sub-points:
6.1 Influence of Mental Programs
This refers to the proportion of subconscious inertia that is altered due to the influence of mental programs.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 60-80%.
6.2 Influence of Hypnotic Waves
This refers to the proportion of subconscious inertia that is altered due to the influence of hypnotic waves.
*Quantitative Data:
The average for humans is around 80-90%.
6.3 Influence of Hypnotic Implants
This refers to the proportion of subconscious inertia that is altered due to the influence of hypnotic implants within the body-complex.
*Quantitative Data:
The average for humans is around 60%.
6.4 Influence of Other Functional Implants
This refers to the proportion of subconscious inertia that is altered due to the influence of other non-hypnotic functional implants within the body-complex.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 30-60%.
6.5 Depth of Influence
This refers to the depth of the impact that inducement methods have on subconscious inertia.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 60-80%.
6.6 Breadth of Influence
This refers to the breadth of the impact that inducement methods have on subconscious inertia.
*Quantitative Data:
The average for humans is around 80-90%.
6.7 Intensity of Influence
This refers to the degree to which inducement methods strengthen subconscious inertia.
*Quantitative Data:
The average for humans is around 60%.
6.8 Variability of Influence
This refers to the impact of inducement methods on causing variations in subconscious inertia, such as successfully inducing a transition from one form of inertia to another. Various collaborative groups often experiment in this area.
*Quantitative Data:
The average for humans is around 60%.
6.9 Integration of Inducement Methods
This refers to the overall consistency of the influence that all inducement methods have on subconscious inertia, such as whether there is planning and whether a systematic inducement chain can be formed.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans fall between 40-60%.
----
- End of 5th Area SoC AssessPoints.
YWS
©Copyright Reserved.
