SoC AssessPoints (1): Central Area - Mind Control
YWS
(3rd Edition 2018-2019)
SoC AssessPoints = "SoC Practice Points" = SoC DevPoints.
There are hundreds of major SoC AssessPoints and tens of thousands of minor ones. These points are experimental data accumulated over countless eons (translated into the virtual time concept of Earth) by professional research organizations specializing in SoC. The tests mainly use the SoC Assessment Instrument, maximizing objectivity and minimizing subjectivity. This article shares the most commonly used major AssessPoints.
For ease of experimentation and management, the SoC AssessPoints are categorized into different "functional areas" according to their function.
Below is the sharing of the AssessPoints in the "Area 1".
----------Table of Contents----------
1. Degree of Automation vs. Degree of Autonomy (Freewill)
2. Degree of Rigid Response vs. Degree of Flexible Response
3. Degree of External Blame vs. Degree of Internal Reflection
4. Degree of Dispersed Consciousness vs. Degree of Focused Consciousness
5. Degree of Rigid Thinking vs. Degree of Free Thinking
6. Degree of Labor Recognition vs. Degree of Enjoyment Recognition
7. Degree of Hostility Toward Strangers vs. Degree of Friendliness Toward Strangers
8. Degree of Sexual Concept Binding vs. Degree of Sexual Concept Freedom
9. Degree of Self-Dissatisfaction vs. Degree of Self-Acceptance
10. Degree of Mental Translation Distortion vs. Degree of Communication Understanding Restoration
11. Degree of Death Resistance (Survival Instinct) vs. Degree of Death Acceptance
12. Degree of Gender Bias vs. Degree of Gender Equality
13. Degree of Comparison with Others vs. Degree of Comparison with Self
----------
Mind Control:
Mind Control = Robotic Automatic Consciousness Program Mode (AI Robotic Program).
Each category has quantified values.
This area's values belong to the "Resistance Ratio" and are all paired.
All assessed values are displayed as a percentage of either "positive value" or "negative value."
The maximum positive value is 100%.
The maximum negative value is 0%.
*Positive and Negative Assessments:
The SoC Assessment Instrument has two data detection modes: "Positive Assessment" and "Negative Assessment." All SoC AssessPoints can be "positively assessed" or "negatively assessed," with their values called "positive value" or "negative value," respectively.
These two values are completely opposite, with the assessment method being the same, only the display method is opposite.
Formula 1: Positive Value = 100% - Negative Value%.
Formula 2: Negative Value = 100% - Positive Value%.
*Positive and Negative Values:
Positive and negative values are quantified data from objective experiments.
They have no direct relationship with human subjective notions of "good" or "bad."
1. Degree of Automation vs. Degree of Autonomy (Freewill)
The mental program (automatic consciousness program) ratio varies for each person; the higher the ratio, the higher the degree of automation and the lower the degree of autonomy. In other words: Robot vs. Free Person.
Here: Automation = AI Robotic Program. Autonomy = Freewill.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans: 40-60% (negative value). (Equivalent to: 60-40% positive value.)
The highest can be 80%, but this is very rare, meaning 80% automation (robot) and 20% autonomy (free person).
This is also the "Resistance Ratio" or "Control Ratio" between the spirit and the body in the human body-complex structure.
For the relationship between the spirit and the body, please refer to YWS's article "The Multi-dimensional Human Body-Complex Structure (2)---- Dual Body-Complex <Spirit + Body>".
2. Degree of Rigid Response vs. Degree of Flexible Response
The response patterns or programs used in the same scenario or behavior. In other words: Robot vs. Free Person.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans: 60-80% (negative value). (Equivalent to 40-20% positive value, same below.)
This means 60-80% "rigid response as a robot" vs. 20-40% "flexible response as a free person."
3. Degree of External Blame vs. Degree of Internal Reflection
The ratio of external blame versus internal reflection when a responsibility event occurs.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans: 60-80% (negative value). (This means 60-80% external blame and 20-40% internal reflection.)
4. Degree of Dispersed Consciousness vs. Degree of Focused Consciousness
Mental program patterns make it difficult to focus, causing distractions that disperse consciousness.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans: around 60% (negative value).
Doing something very focused, like fine craftsmanship or intricate surgery, requires at least below 20%.
Forcing oneself to focus causes fatigue.
Immersing oneself in a sense of tranquility has a calming effect.
5. Degree of Rigid Thinking vs. Degree of Free Thinking
The proportion of mental program thinking within individual thought. Mostly mechanical, rigid, and blind processes.
These often come from traditional customs, social propaganda, and media influence, and also belong to the belief system.
Typical process: "This thought is normal, isn't everyone like this?"
"Fixed = Safe" and similar brainwashing consciousness and social brainwashing systems are also supporting programs, as well as religious systems.
External brainwashing propaganda continually reinforces those patterns and programs.
For example, materialism was also created under the guidance of the T-group, who provided much inspiration.
The huge false worldview stands on an obvious blind spot.
For example, theory is a program of assumptions upon assumptions, trapping oneself within it.
Some truths that the program does not want you to see, you cannot see, even if they are right in front of you.
There are also several primitive basic setting programs for humans.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans: around 60-80% (negative value).
6. Degree of Labor Recognition vs. Degree of Enjoyment Recognition
Believing that people must labor and work, and society must constantly develop. Labor is honorable; enjoyment is shameful.
For example: Not working leads to insecurity, equating to a lack of responsibility, and similar programs.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans: 80-90% (negative value).
7. Degree of Hostility Toward Strangers vs. Degree of Friendliness Toward Strangers
Subconscious reactions before any understanding or contact with a stranger, not directed at a specific person but at strangers as a group.
This stems from humans being programmed as a species with dualistic competitive consciousness.
Strangers are seen as potential competitors for food and territory, with deep-seated hostility.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans: over 80%, nearly everyone has a defensive mindset.
It is a subconscious programmed reaction that generates a sense of hostility even before any actual contact with the other party has begun.
8. Degree of Sexual Concept Binding vs. Degree of Sexual Concept Freedom
Mental program patterns create various program concepts that bind humans, making it difficult for sexual nature to be freely expressed.
The more conservative a person's sexual concepts, the stronger their internal sexual desire.
The more conservative the area, the stronger the internal resistance.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans: varies by region, 30-40% in the U.S., around 30% in the Netherlands, and 70-80% (negative value) in some conservative areas.
9. Degree of Self-Dissatisfaction vs. Degree of Self-Acceptance
Humans are programmed to be dissatisfied with themselves, projecting dissatisfaction onto their surroundings and the world, generating the motivation to transform the world.
Self-dissatisfaction leads to inferiority;
dissatisfaction with others leads to control;
dissatisfaction with the world leads to desire.
The mental system has a set of perfect standard programs, and comparing oneself to them, one will find that they never measure up.
Because individuals cannot clearly see themselves, they believe what the mind program tells them they are like, and they will never reach the perfect standard.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans: 80-90% (negative value).
10. Degree of Mental Translation Distortion vs. Degree of Communication Understanding Restoration
The true meaning the other party wants to express during communication needs to be understood through the individual's mental program pattern.
Different mental program patterns lead to different understanding levels, causing many meanings to be distorted.
Communicating through the mind system makes it difficult to see the other party's true intent.
What you hear is not what the other party really said to you; it's what your mind system translated for you, what your mind system told you. So effective communication is generally difficult to achieve.
If someone is very subjective, meaning they have many mental blocks and prejudices, it will be challenging to objectively hear what the other person is saying.
If you find yourself unable to understand what someone is saying, it might be a good thing, because your mind system cannot translate for you; it has exceeded its vocabulary and program.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans: 70-80% (negative value), generally still accustomed to communicating through the mind system.
The degree of understanding difference is above 60%. As long as you communicate with the mind system, understanding is generally low.
The mental program pattern appears to lack intelligence.
It's as if it doesn't inherently possess understanding and relies on mechanical algorithms.
It belongs to mechanical algorithms, machine hearing.
Therefore, experienced and knowledgeable people seem to have higher understanding because it is based on real experience, not mechanical algorithms, theoretical reasoning, or other virtual programs.
11. Degree of Death Resistance (Survival Instinct) vs. Degree of Death Acceptance
The robotic mental patterns will tell you that you cannot die and must stay alive; living on is better than dying.
Because once the body dies, the mental system (mind program) also ceases to exist, and the mental system cannot allow itself to disappear.
Therefore, it cannot tell you: you still have a soul, and the soul does not die.
The mental system itself does not want to "die."
The mind system will fabricate a myriad of reasons for you to avoid death, to hold on to this or that, creating a fear of death by suggesting that death means having nothing left.
The soul does not fear death; it is the mind (the robotic mental program) that fears it.
This seems to parallel the attitude towards the death of others, where fearing the death of loved ones equates to fearing one's own death.
Inability to accept the death of loved ones = inability to accept one's own death.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans: 80-90% (negative value).
12. Degree of Gender Bias vs. Degree of Gender Equality
Different periods have different gender concepts, with patriarchy and matriarchy fluctuating.
Many previous lives may have been heavily involved in either patriarchy or matriarchy, carrying memories, thoughts, and preferences of the opposite sex from previous lives.
It is difficult to achieve balance.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans: 60-90% (negative value), varying by the openness of the region.
Different periods have different gender perspectives, such as patriarchy or feminism, which are difficult to balance over time.
This is also part of the primitive programming of humanity, which continuously judges gender in various ways. These judgments vary by time period.
It is either patriarchal or feminist, making it difficult to achieve balance.
This includes the acceptance of homosexuality, which is also related to gender.
*Quantitative Data:
Most humans: 60-90% (negative value), with varying levels of openness depending on the region.
In more inclusive and open societies, there is less bias. Many LGBTQ+ individuals have higher levels of gender bias themselves.
The originally set programming is hard to modify, requiring high levels of authority and technical skill, and generally, it seems that such changes are not made.
Matriarchal societies are considered experimental for specific periods.
13. Degree of Comparing Others vs. Degree of Self-Comparison**
This is also a primitive characteristic of humanity (primitive programming).
By nature, humans tend to compare themselves with others, which fosters a sense of competition, rivalry, and aggression, promoting societal development.
This also leads to a series of superiority complexes and discriminatory attitudes.
People can turn almost anything into a comparison of "I am stronger, they are weaker," "I am better, they are worse," "I am right, they are wrong," "I am righteous, they are evil."
The mind forces comparisons, bringing out many incomparable things to compare, creating numerous standards.
Upon close observation, many of these comparisons seem irrational and disconnected.
This type of comparison is closely related to binary oppositions.
Many oppositions are developed from comparative awareness programs.
*Quantitative Data:
Average for humans: Approximately 90% (negative value).
----
- End of 1st Area SoC AssessPoints.
YWS
©Copyright Reserved.
